STOBAUGH & STRONG
Rush & Wolf
v. State of Washington
"Rush II"
King County Superior Court
Civil Case No. 21-2-04314-0
Part-Time Community and Technical College
Instructors Denied Retirement Benefits
Part-time Washington community and technical college employees averaging half-time work are eligible for supplemental retirement benefits under the State Board Retirement Plan. Mader v. State of Washington, King County Superior Court No. 98-2-30850-8. The State has wrongly denied participants both contributions and years of service.
Named Plaintiff Dana Rush has worked half-time or more as a part-time Washington community college instructor since 1991. He, and other community and technical college academic employees like him, obtained the right to participate in the State Board's Retirement Plan through the Mader litigation. But when it came time for him to retire, the State failed to provide the retirement benefits he was owed.
Named plaintiff Gary Wolf worked half-time or more as a part-time Washington community college instructor for over 15 years. Under the State Board's Retirement Plan, employees are eligible for a supplemental defined benefit calculation when they have "ten or more years of service." But the State Board denied his application for a benefit calculation, claiming the eligibility requirement was ten years of continuous service.
Recently, King County Superior Court Judge Cindi Port granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on one issue, finding that the plain language of the plan terms requires only "ten or more years of service" to be eligible for a supplemental benefit calculation, whether or not that service is continuous. Read the court order in the Case Documents section below.
Case Documents
May. 10, 2024
Jul. 15, 2024
Jul. 25, 2024
May 8, 2023